Defense

February 26, 2016
 

Laser weapons development by 2023

Tags:
David Vergun
Army News

The Sodium Guidestar at the Air Force Research Laboratory’s Starfire Optical Range resides on a 6,240 foot hilltop at Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M. The Army and Navy is developing its own laser weapons systems.

Responding to lawmakers’ questions about how close the Army is to developing offensive and defensive directed-energy weapons, Mary J. Miller responded: “I believe we’re very close.”

Miller, deputy assistant secretary of the Army for Research and Technology, and other experts testified before the House Armed Services Committee’s Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities, Feb. 24. Miller’s topic was the Army’s Science and Technology, or S&T, Program for fiscal year 2017.

The Army’s S&T effort is committed to pursuing high-energy lasers, she said. That effort has been used in an analysis of alternatives for the Indirect Fire Protection Capability program of record.

Now, that effort has been “aligned to transition into a program of record in the fiscal 2023 timeframe,” she said. It’s already planned and funded.

“Why that long?” she asked rhetorically.

Because it’s being done in a “step-wise demonstration of capability,” she said. “We have to make sure the lasers work and do the full set of scopes against the threats we project. And those threats include the counter-rockets, counter-artillery and counter-mortar as well as [Unmanned Aerial Vehicle] and cruise missile threats.”

Miller explained that the Army wants to understand the lasers’ full capabilities “before we offer it to a soldier.”

Operators need to trust what lasers can do, she added.

“Lasers have been promised for a long time, but they’ve never held up and delivered what was asked for, so the operators are rightfully skeptical,” she pointed out. That’s why the Army is taking lasers out into operational environments and testing them.
In the meantime, “there will be steps along the way where we spin off lesser capable laser systems that can do good things on smaller platforms. Those will come out soon,” she concluded.

Dr. David Walker, deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force for Science, Technology and Engineering, Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition, agreed with Miller’s logic for step-wise rollouts.

“We too have spun off lesser-capable laser systems,” he said, following Miller’s remarks.

The Air Force is flying every day with lasers under its transport aircraft, using them as infrared countermeasure system,” so we too spun off lesser-capable laser systems and as we get larger power outputs and better thermal management out of smaller package lasers, we will build those powers into defensive to offensive capability as well,” Walker said.

Walker also said the Air Force is working with Special Operations Command to develop an offensive laser that will be fitted to AFSOC AC-130 gunships. Part of that technology, he said, includes “beam-steering and power and thermal management.”

The Navy’s science representative described similar laser programs for ships, subs and Marines.

A lawmaker asked if the services are duplicating efforts.

Dr. Stephen Welby, assistant secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics, replied that all activities of each of the services are coordinated through the High Energy Laser Joint Technology Office.

That office “serves as a clearing house and center of coordination across all the service departments to ensure each of our investments are aligned and not duplicative and are building on each other in each of our domains and service-unique issues,” he explained. “We coordinate very well,” he added, terming the effort part of the “third offset strategy.”

A lawmaker then asked Welby what the third offset means.

He explained that laser programs are just a small part of the third offset, which is the Defense Department’s endeavor to dominate the battlefield of the future with “asymmetric advantages.” Other offset strategies include unmanned and autonomous systems and cognitive warfare, he added.

The first two offsets involved Cold War efforts targeting the Soviet Union, the first being tactical nuclear weapons developed in the 1950s and precision weapons in the 1970s, he explained.




All of this week's top headlines to your email every Friday.


 
 

 

Headlines – September 21, 2018

News Foreign warships in South China Sea ‘causing trouble’, Beijing’s envoy says – Big countries from outside the region are abusing their freedom of navigation rights and causing trouble in the South China Sea, Beijing’s ambassador to Britain said, in a clear jab at Western nations’ recent operations in the disputed waterway.     Business...
 
 

News Briefs – September 21, 2018

Putin says Russia perfected weapons based on Syria campaign Russian President Vladimir Putin says that the military’s combat experience gained in Syria has helped develop new weapons systems. Russia has waged a campaign in Syria since September 2015, helping turn the tide of war in favor of Syrian President Bashar Assad. The Russian military has...
 
 
Courtesy photograph

Tailwheel: The mascot of War Eagle Field

Courtesy photograph Tailwheel  As the saying goes, if you’re performing, never follow a child or animal act for you will surely fail! My apologies to anyone who has ever fallen victim to that, because this issue’s story is...