Local

May 16, 2013

April 2013 Crime and Punishment

355th Fighter Wing Judge Advocate

Article 15 Actions: During April 2013, D-M commanders administered 17 Nonjudicial Punishment actions under Article 15 of the UCMJ. The punishments imposed reflect the commander’s determination of an appropriate punishment after considering the circumstances of the offense and the offender’s record. A “suspended” punishment does not take effect unless the offender engages in additional misconduct or fails to satisfy the conditions of the suspension. The suspension period usually lasts for six months unless a lesser amount is specified.

Failure to Go and Failure to Obey a Lawful Order or Regulation – An airman received a reduction to the grade of airman basic, 15 days extra duty, and a reprimand.

Failure to Obey a Lawful Order or Regulation – A senior airman received a reduction to the grade of airman basic, with reduction below the grade of airman suspended, and 45 days extra duty.

Wrongful use of a Controlled Substance – An airman first class received a reduction to the grade of airman basic, suspended forfeitures of $758 pay per month for one month, and 45 days extra duty.

Wrongful use of a Controlled Substance – An airman first class received a reduction to the grade of airman basic, suspended forfeitures of $758 pay per month for one month, and 30 days extra duty.

Wrongful use and possession of a Controlled Substance – An airman first class received a reduction to the grade of airman basic, suspended forfeitures of $758 pay per month for one month, and 45 days extra duty.

Wrongful use of a Controlled Substance – An airman first class received a reduction to the grade of airman basic, suspended forfeitures of $758 pay per month for one month, and 30 days extra duty.

Failure to Obey a Lawful Order or Regulation – An airman first class received a suspended reduction to the grade of airman, and 30 days of extra duty.

Failure to Obey a Lawful Order or Regulation – An airman first class received a suspended reduction to the grade of airman, suspended forfeitures of $849 pay per month for one month, restriction to base for 25 days, and 25 days of extra duty.

Failure to Obey a Lawful Order or Regulation and False Official Statement – An airman first class received a reduction to the grade of airman, restriction to base for 15 days, and 45 days of extra duty.

Failure to Obey a Lawful Order or Regulation and False Official Statement – An airman received a reduction to the grade of airman basic, forfeitures of $758 pay for two months, restriction to base for 15 days, and 45 days of extra duty.

Failure to Obey a Lawful Order or Regulation and False Official Statement – An airman first class received a reduction to the grade of airman, restriction to base for 15 days, and 45 days of extra duty.

Failure to Obey a Lawful Order or Regulation and False Official Statement – An airman first class received a suspended reduction to the grade of airman and a reprimand.

Failure to Obey a Lawful Order or Regulation – A senior airman received 30 days of extra duty and a reprimand.

Failure to Obey a Lawful Order or Regulation – A senior airman received a reduction to the grade of airman basic and 45 days of extra duty.

Dereliction of Duty – A staff sergeant received a reduction to the grade of senior airman, 15 days of extra duty, and a reprimand.

Failure to Obey a Lawful Order or Regulation and False Official Statement – An airman first class received a reduction to the grade of airman basic with reduction to the grade of airman suspended, suspended forfeitures of $849 pay per month for one month, and 15 days of extra duty.

Failure to Go, Dereliction of Duty, and Drunk on Duty – An airman first class received a reduction to the grade of airman, suspended forfeitures of $849 pay per month for two months, 45 days of extra duty, and a reprimand.

Article 15 Metrics:

D-M 93% Compliant in April

The Air Force metric is to serve 80% of all Article 15s within 30 calendar days of discovery of the crime.

NJP Top 3 Offenses Apr 2013

1. Failure to Obey Lawful Order

2. Wrongful Use of a Controlled Substance

3. False Official Statement

 

DUIs at D-M

2012 2013

355 MXG 12 4

355 MSG 12 0

355 FW   0 0

355 MDG 2 0

355 OG 1 0

12 AF 3 2

TENANTS 10 5

DMAFB TOTAL 40 11

Year to date as of 30 Apr 13

 

Courts-martial: All courts-martial are open to the public. Visit our U.S. Air Force Public Docket website at http://www.afjag.af.mil/docket/index.asp for more information.

1) Senior Airman Shawn J. Parker, 355th Equipment Maintenance Squadron, was tried by special court-martial on 12 April 2013. He was charged with being absent without leave, in violation of UCMJ Article 86, and failure to obey a lawful order or regulation, in violation of UCMJ Article 92 by possessing and using Spice as well as misusing his government travel card. The spice charges were withdrawn due to improper rights advisements. SrA Parker plead not guilty to the charges and was sentenced by a panel of officer and enlisted members to reduction to the grade of airman basic, confinement for 42 days, and a bad conduct discharge.

Note: Once a military member is suspected of a crime, they cannot be questioned without reading them their Article 31 rights.

2) Airman First Class Robert B. Neuhoff Jr., 755th Aircraft Maintenance Squadron, was tried by summary court-martial on 23 April 2013. He was charged with drunken operation of a vehicle, in violation of UCMJ Article 111. A1C Neuhoff plead guilty to the charge and was sentenced by the Summary Court Officer to confinement for 30 days, forfeiture of $1000 pay per month for one month, and reduction to the grade of airman basic.

Questions and Answers

Q: Can a commander remove punishment from an Article 15?

A: Yes, this is called a set aside. A set aside voids the entire nonjudicial punishment action and restores any rights, privileges, pay or property affected by the punishment. A commander may not set aside punishment more than four months after the execution of the punishment, unless the commander determines unusual circumstances exist. If you have any questions, please contact the 355th Fighter Wing Legal Office.




All of this week's top headlines to your email every Friday.


 
 

 
(U.S. Air Force Photo by Airman 1st Class Chris Massey)

9/11 Tower Challenge held at UofA

The Never Forgotten 9/11 Tower Challenge was held at the University of Arizona Football Stadium on Sept. 11. Approximately 350 participants, including personnel from D-M, attempted the challenge of climbing 2,071 stairs. This f...
 
 

Core elements work together

LUKE AIR FORCE BASE, Ariz. — The Air Force has built a suicide prevention program based on 11 overlapping core elements that stress community involvement and leadership in the prevention of suicides in the military: Leadership involvement — Air Force leaders actively support the entire spectrum of suicide prevention initiatives in the community. Addressing suicide...
 
 

Keep sports safe

LUKE AIR FORCE BASE, Ariz. — Playing sports is fun and it helps people keep in shape and relieve stress. However, if one is not careful, playing sports can result in injuries that keep Airmen on the sideline and out of work. “The main cause of sports-related injuries is over aggressive play and people going...
 

 
DoD

Ice bucket challenge – What does DOD say?

LUKE AIR FORCE BASE, Ariz. — If you have been following social media lately, you’ve seen the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge all over your newsfeed and Instagram. This has become an internet phenomenon in which people get doused with ice water to raise money to combat Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease....
 
 

Air Force Enlisted Village: Not just a place to live, a place to call home

I first visited the Air Force Enlisted Village as a young first sergeant in 2009, when I was stationed at Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida. I went to visit with the Tyndall Active Airmen’s Association, Tyndall’s E-1 to E-4 Professional Association, and was amazed at what I saw. This was also the first time I...
 
 

Advise Airmen of rights before asking questions

LUKE AIR FORCE BASE, Ariz. — Every day supervisors are faced with challenging scenarios and situations that require them to engage in efforts to help their Airmen. When this engagement is due to a negative act such as theft, damage to property or other possible legal violations, we must resist the instinct to question them...
 




0 Comments


Be the first to comment!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Directory powered by Business Directory Plugin