Army

February 15, 2013

Inspector General inspections help units adhere to standards

Maj. Marty Bishop
Deputy Inspector General, Fort Huachuca IG Office

inspector_general
Inspections are one way to determine if organizations and units are adhering with standards. One role the Inspector General, or IG, has is to provide their directing authority, normally the commanding general, or CG, a means of unit and organizational oversight, and IG inspections are normally the method used to provide it.

IG inspections are not intended to demean or harass units. Almost all IG actions, to include inspections, cannot be used as the basis for adverse action. That is to say virtually everything the IG does cannot be used as grounds for punishment. IG inspections assess units through identifying findings, observations and sharing good news stories. Findings and observations are collected throughout an inspection, but neither individuals nor units are specifically named or otherwise identified.

Findings and observations start with a finding statement. Finding statements use terms such as “few,” “some” or “most.” Through using such terms, the IG protects individual and unit identifying information and confidentiality. One example of a finding-statement for a finding/observation is, “few units have not appointed their voting assistance officer [VAO].”

Immediately following the finding statement in a finding, the IG states the standard or standards. If no regulatory standard applies, then the finding becomes an observation. Our example continues with this standard, “AR 608-20, Para 2-14a. ‘Appoint, in writing, unit VAOs (in the grades of first lieutenant/sergeant first class or above) in all units with 25 or more permanently assigned members.’”

The next step is identifying the “root cause” of the finding or observation using the root-cause-analysis model. This model identifies reasons why findings and observations exist, such as the example of “few units have not identified and trained their voting assistance officer.” The model has three possible reasons why a finding occurred: don’t know; can’t comply; or won’t comply. An applicable unit either doesn’t know about the standard (the need for having an identified and trained voting assistance officer); the unit can’t comply with the standard (such as not having the resources required); or the unit knows about the standard but isn’t interested in adhering to it.

After the root cause is identified and captured, inspectors general complete findings or observations by providing problem-solving recommendations for the finding or observation. To finish the ‘finding’ example, “Recommend all units appoint their voting assistance officer in accordance with the regulatory standard stated in AR 608-20, Para 2-14a.”

IG inspections also have other impacts on individuals and units. Units usually know in advance the IG is going to conduct an inspection and they will normally prepare for it. Units typically review regulatory standards and refocus their efforts to ensure they are operating within those standards. Units review unit personnel appointment orders, make sure they have the appropriate personnel, and they are properly trained. If a unit is unsure of what the IG will be inspecting, they must contact the IG for more information.

The process of completing an IG inspection includes compiling all findings, observations and good news stories into the final inspection report. Once completed, the report is submitted to the CG for review. Once the CG is briefed and has reviewed the report, it is then distributed to all units.
Commanders review final inspection reports to see how all units and organizations fared during the inspection and review recommendations, which are then normally implemented in part or verbatim by each commander in order to improve their own individual unit or organization.




All of this week's top headlines to your email every Friday.


 
 

 
Tanja Linton

Intelligence Senior Leader Conference maps out ‘way ahead’

Tanja Linton U.S. Army Intelligence Center of Excellence Commander Maj. Gen. Robert Ashley opened the Intelligence Senior Leaders Conference at the Intelligence System Integration Laboratory Dec. 10. Senior intelligence leaders...
 
 

Army toughens rules on enlisted fraternization

Office romance provides interesting water-cooler gossip in the civilian world and an endless source of material for television sitcoms. However, in the military it can potentially compromise good order and discipline. Consequently, the Army has decided to toughen the rules on fraternization once again. While intimate or romantic relationships have been prohibited between enlisted and...
 
 

CWFC designed to improve employee morale

There’s an organization on post designed to enhance the quality of life for Fort Huachuca federal Civilian employees during and outside of duty hours. The Civilian Welfare Fund Council, or CWFC, Fort Huachuca, is a Category IV Non-appropriated Fund Instrumentality with proceeds from concessionaire commissions. Its purpose is to manage the Civilian Welfare Funds, or...
 

 
U.S. Army

Military Intelligence – Moment in MI history

Operation Just Cause has its 25th anniversary At 1 a.m. on Dec. 20, 1989, roughly 13,000 American troops under the operational command of the XVIII Airborne Corps airlifted into Panama to join the 13,000 Soldiers and Marines al...
 
 

ACS offers scholarships, resiliency training

AER provides scholarships Army Emergency Relief maintains two scholarship programs — the Spouse Education Assistance Program and the Maj. Gen. James Ursano Scholarship Program for dependent children. Both scholarships provide financial assistance for students who are pursuing their first undergraduate degree. Scholarship applications will be accepted from Jan. 2 to May 1 each year for...
 
 

FH Exchange shoppers save with price matching

Whether shopping in stores or online, Soldiers, retirees and their Families get the lowest price at the Fort Huachuca Exchange. In fact, shoppers who price matched at Army & Air Force Exchange Service locations worldwide saved $6.4 million in 2013. At brick-and-mortar locations, price differences of $10 or less are matched on the spot —...
 




0 Comments


Be the first to comment!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Directory powered by Business Directory Plugin