Army

June 28, 2013

Proper counseling, NCO evaluation procedures ease NCOER process

Sgt. 1st Class Dexter Robinson
Fort Huachuca Inspector General’s Office

Over the last few months, Inspector General’s Office personnel have seen an increase of issues dealing with noncommissioned officer evaluation reports, or NCOERs. Some of the issues were noncommissioned officers, or NCOs, not being counseled; incorrect counseling dates; issues happening outside the rating period; and individuals who were not the rater completing the NCOER.

The NCOER has its own redress system which is in Department of the Army, or DA, Pamphlet 623-3, “Personnel Evaluation Reporting System,” dated June 5, 2012, chapter 6, but IG Office personnel can often address and resolve these issues locally prior to submission to Headquarters, Department of the Army.

Counseling is an essential part of the NCOER. The DA Form 2166-8, “NCOER Counseling Support Form,” provides evaluation information to ensure sound personnel management decisions can be made, and an NCO’s potential can be fully developed.

Counseling should be conducted quarterly and within the first 30 days of the rating period. The initial counseling should consist of the performance standards, what is expected of the NCO, the rating chain, duty description, and the meaning of values and responsibilities on the NCOER. The rater should also end the session by recapturing the key points covered on DA Form 2166-8-1 and have the rated NCO initial it.

Counseling also makes completing the NCOER easy.

The NCOER is comprised of five parts. They are administrative data, authentication, duty description, Army values/attributes/skills/actions and overall performance and potential. IG Office personnel recommend NCOs thoroughly view each section for inaccuracies and common mistakes.

Some Soldiers think their signature means they agree with the NCOER, but that is not true. DA PAM 623-3, Table 3-2 states, “The rated NCO’s signature verifies the following: They have seen the completed report, the administrative data (Part I) is correct (except Part I, k through o), the rating officials are proper (Part II), the duty description is accurate (Part III) and includes the counseling dates, the APFT and height/weight entries are correct (Part IV c), and that the rated NCO is aware of the appeals process.

It is important that rated NCOs and rating officials clearly understand the rated NCO’s signature does not constitute agreement or disagreement with the evaluations of the rater and/or senior rater. If the rated Soldier is unavailable, unable, or fails to sign the DA Form 2166-8 for any reason, the senior rater will either resolve the problem or explain why in DA Form 2166-8, Part V-e, and the rated Soldier’s signature is left blank. The report will not be delayed because it lacks the rated Soldier’s signature.”

Leaders must ensure they know what the regulation states. Each leader should regularly review Army Regulation 623-3, “Personnel Evaluation Reporting System,” dated June 5, 2012, and DA Pam 623-3, to assist in completing counselings and NCOERs.

Regulations change often, and leaders should set NCOs up for success. In instances where the NCO is not performing up to standard, then leaders have a leadership challenge to mentor and provide guidance for that NCO so he or she can meet the required performance standard.

For questions about this article, ratings or counselings, call Robinson, 533.3448.




All of this week's top headlines to your email every Friday.


 
 

 
U.S. Army IMCOM photo by Amanda S. Rodriguez

Civilian mentor program shapes Army installation management’s future

U.S. Army IMCOM photo by Amanda S. Rodriguez U.S. Army Installation Management Command mentors and mentees work on teambuilding skills, building a block tower in total silience, during the IMCOM Headquarters Centralized Mentori...
 
 
Interrogation-Station

Military Intelligence – Moment in MI history

U.S. Army Intelligence School opened in Langres, France July 25, 1918 Troops sift through the effects of captured Germans for items of intelligence value. “Late in July, 1918, about fifty officers gathered at the high-walled ...
 
 

ACAP has new name, now Soldier for Life – Transition Assistance Program

As part of the Soldier for Life Program that was introduced last year, the Army Career and Alumni Program, or ACAP, has changed names to the Soldier for Life – Transition Assistance Program, effective immediately. In an effort to better reflect the new direction of Army transition with the Soldier for Life Program, Army Chief...
 

 
Payload-Nero

Army test successful on UAV jammer payload NERO

Doug McDaniel, PM UAS View of the NERO jamming payload attached to a Gray Eagle. NERO stands for Networked Electronic Warfare Remotely Operated.
 
 
Untitled-1

Military Intelligence – Moment in MI history

Colonel Charles Young: Buffalo Soldier and Intelligence Officer Courtesy Photo As a major and then Lieutenant Colonel, Charles Young served with the 10th Cavalry during the Punitive Expedition into Mexico in 1916. This article ...
 
 
Soldier-Life-cycle

Soldier Life Cycle changes way Army preps troops for eventual transition

Maj. Rohan McLean, left, with Mission Command Battle Lab, and other class participants listen to tips from SCORE volunteer Ken Harris as he leads a session of the Army Career and Alumni Program entrepreneurial workshop, Boots t...
 




0 Comments


Be the first to comment!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Directory powered by Business Directory Plugin