Army

March 21, 2014

Congress told Army needs another BRAC round

Gary Sheftick
Army News Service

WASHINGTON — The Army has excess infrastructure that is expensive to maintain. Under a tight budget, funds used to maintain that infrastructure could be better spent on Soldier readiness, officials told lawmakers, Wednesday.

Katherine Hammack, assistant secretary of the Army for Installations, Energy and Environment, testified before the House Appropriations Committee, subcommittee on military construction, veterans affairs and related agencies. She and her counterparts from the other services and Department of Defense explained the need for another round of base realignment and closure, known as BRAC.

“We simply do not have the money to operate buildings that are empty,” Hammack said, adding that facilities in mothballs are also “lost opportunities” for surrounding communities who might make better use of the property.

John Conger, acting deputy under secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment, said the last BRAC round of 2005, which cost $35 billion to implement, “has left a bad taste.” Emphasis in 2005 was on “transformation” instead of only efficiencies.

“The key reason that BRAC 2005 cost so much is we were willing to accept recommendations that did not save money — that did not pay back,” he said. Any future BRAC round would solely focus on efficiencies, he said.

The last BRAC round identified an excess Army infrastructure capacity of more than 20 percent, Hammack said, adding that only 3.5 percent was reduced.

“So there is clearly excess capacity that has been there awhile that we have not addressed,” Hammack said.

In addition, she said any future end-strength reduction that puts the Army below 490,000 Soldiers will result in excess capacity.
The Army currently has an excess capacity ranging between 12 to 28 percent, depending upon the category of facility, Hammack said. She pointed out that a facility capacity analysis is currently underway Army-wide, and should be completed this year. The analysis will identify exactly how much excess is in the inventory, and will suggest opportunities for consolidation.

In addition, a programmatic environmental assessment, or PEA, is also underway, “taking another look at infrastructure,” she said.
“BRAC is a proven means to address excess capacity in the United States,” Hammack said.

The Army receives about $2 billion net savings annually from previous BRAC rounds, Hammack said. She went on to say DoD saves about $3.8 billion annually from BRAC 2005, and about $12 billion from all previous BRAC rounds.

Savings from another BRAC round are needed, Hammack said. The Army’s proposed fiscal year 2015 budget of $1.3 billion for military construction and Family housing is about a 39-percent reduction from the fiscal year 2014 budget.

The focus with a reduced budget is only on repairing or replacing infrastructure that is “failing,” Hammack said, although the Army is also asking for $13 billion for installation energy, environmental programs, facility sustainment, restoration and modernization and base operations support.

Current budget levels require a “difficult balance between the cost of maintaining infrastructure and force readiness,” Hammack said.

In Europe, she said the Army is “on track” to shrink overseas infrastructure and the same will be necessary in the continental United States.

In addressing excess infrastructure, Hammack said the Army and Congress have both historically concluded that BRAC is “more transparent and economically advantageous” than other ways of addressing excess capacity.

“We have a clear business case for a 2014 round,” Hammack said. “There is a clear path forward for Congress to agree to a new round of BRAC.”




All of this week's top headlines to your email every Friday.


 
 

 
Julianne E. Cochran

Help wanted: Enlisted aides in valued roles for Army leaders

Julianne E. Cochran An Enlisted Aide Training Course instructor shows a student the specifics of setting up a general officer’s uniform during a practical exercise. WASHINGTON – Enlisted aides are considered an elite group ...
 
 

CWFC supports Fort’s civilian employees

Fort Huachuca’s Civilian Welfare Fund Council (CWFC) uses the money derived from vending machines to support federal employees. Each month a percentage of the money from post snack and soda vending machines goes into a secured CWFC account to provide morale and recreational activities to civilian employees. According to Carmen Chastain, CWFC president, these activities...
 
 
Photo courtesy of Richard Grosinsky

Hunter unmanned aircraft system ends history here, leaves long legacy

Photo courtesy of Richard Grosinsky From that first Hunter unmanned aircraft system training class that graduated here April 27, 1992, to its final flight here July 10, Fort Huachuca’s UAS program continues to build on the vi...
 

 

Official participation in #GiveThem20 campaign not authorized

The Office of the Judge Advocate General has been notified by the DOD Standards of Conduct Office about an online social media campaign titled”#GiveThem20.” The action is supported by, and draws attention to, a national nonprofit organization called American Corporate Partners. The campaign is online at GiveThem20.org. The campaign proposes video recording yourself or a...
 
 

OPM announces steps to protect federal workers, others from cyber threats

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) announced July 15 the results of the interagency forensics investigation into a recent cyber incident involving federal background investigation data and the steps it is taking to protect those impacted. Throughout this investigation, OPM has been committed to providing information in a timely, transparent and accurate...
 
 
U.S. Army photo

Military Intelligence – Moment in MI history

Maj. Gen. Ralph Van Deman – Namesake of the East Gate U.S. Army photo Maj. Gen. Paul Menoher, commander of the US Army Intelligence Center, and Command Sgt. Maj. Art Johnson unveil the memorialization plaque at the Van Deman ...
 




0 Comments


Be the first to comment!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>