Army

March 21, 2014

Congress told Army needs another BRAC round

Gary Sheftick
Army News Service

WASHINGTON — The Army has excess infrastructure that is expensive to maintain. Under a tight budget, funds used to maintain that infrastructure could be better spent on Soldier readiness, officials told lawmakers, Wednesday.

Katherine Hammack, assistant secretary of the Army for Installations, Energy and Environment, testified before the House Appropriations Committee, subcommittee on military construction, veterans affairs and related agencies. She and her counterparts from the other services and Department of Defense explained the need for another round of base realignment and closure, known as BRAC.

“We simply do not have the money to operate buildings that are empty,” Hammack said, adding that facilities in mothballs are also “lost opportunities” for surrounding communities who might make better use of the property.

John Conger, acting deputy under secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment, said the last BRAC round of 2005, which cost $35 billion to implement, “has left a bad taste.” Emphasis in 2005 was on “transformation” instead of only efficiencies.

“The key reason that BRAC 2005 cost so much is we were willing to accept recommendations that did not save money — that did not pay back,” he said. Any future BRAC round would solely focus on efficiencies, he said.

The last BRAC round identified an excess Army infrastructure capacity of more than 20 percent, Hammack said, adding that only 3.5 percent was reduced.

“So there is clearly excess capacity that has been there awhile that we have not addressed,” Hammack said.

In addition, she said any future end-strength reduction that puts the Army below 490,000 Soldiers will result in excess capacity.
The Army currently has an excess capacity ranging between 12 to 28 percent, depending upon the category of facility, Hammack said. She pointed out that a facility capacity analysis is currently underway Army-wide, and should be completed this year. The analysis will identify exactly how much excess is in the inventory, and will suggest opportunities for consolidation.

In addition, a programmatic environmental assessment, or PEA, is also underway, “taking another look at infrastructure,” she said.
“BRAC is a proven means to address excess capacity in the United States,” Hammack said.

The Army receives about $2 billion net savings annually from previous BRAC rounds, Hammack said. She went on to say DoD saves about $3.8 billion annually from BRAC 2005, and about $12 billion from all previous BRAC rounds.

Savings from another BRAC round are needed, Hammack said. The Army’s proposed fiscal year 2015 budget of $1.3 billion for military construction and Family housing is about a 39-percent reduction from the fiscal year 2014 budget.

The focus with a reduced budget is only on repairing or replacing infrastructure that is “failing,” Hammack said, although the Army is also asking for $13 billion for installation energy, environmental programs, facility sustainment, restoration and modernization and base operations support.

Current budget levels require a “difficult balance between the cost of maintaining infrastructure and force readiness,” Hammack said.

In Europe, she said the Army is “on track” to shrink overseas infrastructure and the same will be necessary in the continental United States.

In addressing excess infrastructure, Hammack said the Army and Congress have both historically concluded that BRAC is “more transparent and economically advantageous” than other ways of addressing excess capacity.

“We have a clear business case for a 2014 round,” Hammack said. “There is a clear path forward for Congress to agree to a new round of BRAC.”




All of this week's top headlines to your email every Friday.


 
 

 
Lisa Ferdinando

Army releases latest policies on female hairstyles, tattoos

Lisa Ferdinando 1st Sgt. Aki Paylor won’t have any trouble recalling the Warrior Ethos. “For me, the Warrior Ethos — that’s who I am.” Since all of Paylor’s tattoos were done a number of years ago, he’s grandfathe...
 
 
Courtesy photo

Military Intelligence – Moment in MI history

Col. Harvey Cook: one of “Boys of Pointe du Hoc” Courtesy photo Harvey Cook was Rudder’s confidant and the 2nd Ranger Battalion’s intelligence and operations officer, 1943-1945. When President Ronald Reagan stood beside...
 
 
Donald Nelson

Logistics Readiness Center provides different facets of support on post

Donald Nelson Soldiers of the 40th Expeditionary Signal Battalion take a class in pallet building April 24 at the battalion’s motor pool. The class dealt with the logistical side of deployment the Soldiers would later experie...
 

 
U.S. Army photo

Military Intelligence – Moment in MI history

Special Operations is part of Army Intelligence Heritage As an intelligence sergeant assigned to Detachment A-102, 5th Special Forces Group, Sgt. 1st Class Bennie Adkins’ job was to oversee intelligence collection on the enem...
 
 
Maranda Flynn

Force protection exercise proves successful at Fort Huachuca

Maranda Flynn Fort Huachuca police secure the area where a “casualty” lies prone. The artificial body was one of the props used during the Aug. 27 force protection exercise that took place on Fort Huachuca. In the backgroun...
 
 
J.D. Leipold

Soldiers to take Military Workplace Survey

J.D. Leipold Soldiers can take the RAND Military Workplace Survey on their smartphones by forwarding the invite to their personal email accounts. FORT MEADE, Md. — Soldiers asked to participate in a workplace survey over the ...
 




0 Comments


Be the first to comment!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Directory powered by Business Directory Plugin