Veterans

February 22, 2013

VA decision on burial rights departs from past

Kevin Freking
Associated Press

The government has cleared the first burial of a same-sex spouse of a veteran in a national cemetery, but it’s far from certain how easy it will be for other gay military couples to win the same benefit.

Who gets buried where is one of the practical decisions that the federal government is grappling with following repeal of the military’s don’t ask, don’t tell policy.

At first glance, Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki’s decision to grant burial to a same-sex spouse in Oregon represents a big departure from past federal policy. In 2004, the VA warned the state of Massachusetts that burying the same-sex spouse of a veteran in a state veterans’ cemetery could lead to the federal government taking back nearly $12 million in grant money.

Then in 2008, the National Cemetery Association published a directive stating that individuals in same-sex civil unions or marriage are not eligible for burial in a national cemetery or state veterans cemetery that received federal money. Those directives were based on the language of the Defense of Marriage Act, which defines a spouse as a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife. The law is being challenged before the Supreme Court.

Then along came retired Lt. Col. Linda Campbell and her spouse, Nancy Lynchild. Campbell, with help from Oregon officials, pressed the VA to allow Lynchild to be buried at the VA’s Willamette National Cemetery.

ìMy commitment to our country, shown through the service that makes me eligible for burial at Willamette, and the significance of the permanent, lifelong commitment I shared with Nancy, should be sufficient to secure a waiver for her and allow us to be buried together,î Campbell wrote to the VA on Jan. 2 shortly after Lynchild’s death.

Shinseki has the authority to deem others eligible for burial at a VA cemetery as he believes necessary, regardless of the wording of the Defense of Marriage Act. The VA said in a statement he did not base his decision to grant burial rights based on the couple’s marital status but on evidence of a ìcommitted relationship between the individual and the veteran.î Also, the department made clear the decision was not intended to create any right or benefit for anyone other than Lynchild.

Still, proponents of the decision said it’s a clear indication that individual waiver requests will be taken seriously by Shinseki if other same-sex couples seek to be buried in one of the VA’s 131 cemeteries.

I think you see a lot of the military changing and it makes sense. They are showing every sign of wanting to do what they can do within the bounds of the law,î said Gary Buseck, legal director at the Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders, an advocacy group.

Campbell’s request began last year when she expressed her frustration to Oregon Labor Commissioner Brad Avakian. In turn, Avakian contacted the VA and noted that Oregon law required equal access to all goods and services for registered domestic partners. He also spoke with the White House, which made clear it was deferring to the VA and wanted to let the process run its course. He said the VA was also communicating with the White House, but he could not say to what degree.

The attitude at the end was clear that they were working very hard to make this work,î Avakian said. ìAnd I’m deeply grateful they spent the time thinking this through carefully and coming to the right conclusion.

Despite the VA’s insistence that Shinseki’s decision only applied to Campbell and Lynchild, Avakian said he believed the decision sent a clear message that would make it easier for future same-sex couples to gain veterans’ burial benefits.

I don’t think there’s any way to get around the fact that is a precedent-setting strong message, he said.

When asked if the Obama administration welcomed Shinseki’s decision, the White House said in a statement: The president has made clear that his administration will treat same-sex couples as fairly as possible, consistent with existing law, and VA’s actions are consistent with that policy.




All of this week's top headlines to your email every Friday.


 
 

 

SBP officials offer same-sex coverage guidance

Survivor Benefit Plan program enrollment is now available for eligible retirees in same-sex marriages. The program provides a monthly income to survivors of retired Airmen upon the retiree’s death when retired pay stops. Survivors of Airmen recalled to active duty from retirement who die while on active duty, may also be protected by the SBP....
 
 

NMCB 3 helps honor homeless vet during VC stand down

More than 20 years ago, Ventura County resident Claire L. Hope visited a veteran’s aid event in Long Beach, Calif., where she was inspired by the degree of free help local legal and health care professionals were happy to give our nation’s homeless heroes. The next year, in 1993, Hope both founded and organized the...
 
 
vet-speech

SMC commander speakers to veterans’ group

Air Force photograph by Hien Vu Lt. Gen. Ellen Pawlikowski, Space and Missile Systems Center commander, speaks at the American Legion Post 43 in Hollywood, Calif., Feb. 4. She spoke about the evolution of space capabilities in ...
 

 
vet-run1

In honor of Veterans Day, airmen run with students

Air Force photograph by Joe Juarez Second Lt. Francisco Lugo and 1st Lt. Berkley Davis run with students from Jefferson Elementary Schoolís Running Club, Nov. 9. The students in the club run, skip, hop or walk for 20 minutes e...
 
 

Labor Department paves job path for service members, vets

Department of Labor officials are reaching out to let transitioning service members and veterans know about the department’s many training programs to give them a successful path to employment. From workshops to job fairs and one-on-one training, DOL is committed to connecting veterans with jobs, Junior Ortiz, DOL’s deputy assistant secretary for Veterans’ Employment, told...
 
 

Knowing common hiring authorities critical in filling civilian positions

As the Air Force continues to reform its hiring processes, hiring managers can make better, timelier decisions when they understand which hiring authorities they should use when recruiting new employees. Hiring appointment authorities provide managers with the legal means to hire employees via a new appointment, transfer or reinstatement. Ensuring managers understand the most frequently...
 




0 Comments


Be the first to comment!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Directory powered by Business Directory Plugin