Defense

May 23, 2012

AEDC’s Air Force Analysis Branch supports TF34 engine accelerated mission test

by Philip Lorenz III
Arnold AFB, Tenn.

An upgraded version of the A-10 fighter’s power plant, the TF34-GE-100, has undergone a six-month AMT in AEDC’s SL-1 test cell to evaluate and validate new components prior to production approval for the fleet upgrade. This has also included intensive data analysis performed by AEDC Air Force Analysis Branch and ATA analysis engineers.

Support from the Arnold Engineering Development Center’s Air Force Analysis Branch recently helped bring a successful conclusion to a “challenging” Accelerated Mission Test on an upgraded TF34 engine, the power source for the A-10 Thunderbolt II, which is nicknamed “Warthog.”

The AEDC is located at Arnold Air Force Base, Tenn.

Josh Hartman, AEDC Air Force test project manager, said ATA analysis engineers also contributed to the project and emphasized that the recent engine testing employed “a more blended team” than has usually been the case for previous AMT entries.

“Between our Air Force Analysis Branch and ATA we always had two people in the control room at SL-1 during the test,” he said. “Any time it was running they were performing data trending and logging. They’ve been monitoring critical engine and facility parameters.”

Regarding the Air Force Analysis Branch, he said, “They’ve been responsible for weekly data packages, uploading the data, trending it, as well as checking data repeatability for performance testing and cell correlation – they’ve done QLRs (quick look reports). Overall they have really done a lot for the test. They’ve been doing a really good job.”

The constant 24/5 monitoring of data from the TF34 AMT entry and offline data analysis on the project serves a two-fold function, according to Joshua Osborne, who, along with Reggie Floyd, conducts aeropropulsion analysis for the Air Force Analysis Branch.

The main benefit of this 24/5 monitoring approach is that it allowed Osborne and Floyd to focus on the in-depth “offline” data analysis.

Osborne said they have historical data from the engine that served as a baseline to compare the recently acquired data with to quantify any observed changes.

“From the historical TF34 data, you can look at [and compare] fuel flows and temperatures, which allows you to correlate how much thrust you get,” he said. “Changes in the engine’s performance are expected, but we specifically wanted to see how much the engine deteriorated over the test and how performance drops off, how much more fuel is it using and pressure changes.

“We’re looking at all the data. The information that we’re giving them [the customer] is engine performance parameters [including] pressures and temperatures around the compressor and turbines, engine speeds, vibrations, and fuel flow to name a few.”

Osborne said Derrick Daniel, Ed Wantland and other ATA analysis engineers have been extremely helpful in his learning of how to analyze engine test data.

“The people that have been helping out with the continual monitoring of the data are engineers from flight systems and space and missiles from our branch, TSTB personnel to include project managers, a lot of second lieutenants, and Mike Dent even stood in for a day,” Osborne said.

“There’ve been multiple instances where they’ve caught some issues with our data instrumentation, for instance a flow meter not reading correctly,” Osborne said. “Catching things like that allows us to go in there, schedule to get it fixed so they’re not constantly recording a bunch of bad data and more importantly ensure the safety of the engine.”

Osborne said the team effort paid off in terms of both efficiency and sharing valuable information.

Osborne acknowledged the AMT entry has provided him with some challenges.

“This was [my] first time and it’s been a learning curve – just kind of thrown in there without any previous engine testing background,” he said. “That was a difficult thing to start off with, but being in that situation you had to learn a lot [and] quickly, which ultimately I believe made me gain more knowledge for this test and makes me more valuable for future tests to come. I’ve also learned a lot because of Derrick Daniel, Ed Wantland and others.”

Hartman said the TF34 customer was pleased with the test result and for good reasons.

“If there’s one thing that AEDC doesn’t compromise on it’s the quality of their data,” he said.

Gus Kamphaus, Aeronautical Systems Center at Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, said there were many benefits of bringing the test to AEDC, including keeping within schedule and budgetary constraints.

“We also improved control of many AMT data quality drivers as a direct result of the TSTA’s analysis effort,” said Kamphaus, who is ASC’s lead engineer for the TF34 Boltless Rotor Upgrade Component Improvement Program. “For example, we were able to reduce the number of water washes during the AMT to mimic fleet maintenance practices. This enabled us to operate the BRU turbine blades at hotter cooling flow temperatures to simulate fleet operation of older engines.”




All of this week's top headlines to your email every Friday.


 
 

 
Air Force photograph by Scott M. Ash

AF leaders seek relief from sequestration-level funding

Air Force photograph by Scott M. Ash Secretary of the Air Force Deborah Lee James and Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark A. Welsh III testify before the House of Representatives Committee on Appropriationsí Defense Subcommitte...
 
 
navy-china

USS Fort Worth conducts CUES with Chinese Navy

The littoral combat ship USS Fort Worth (LCS 3) practiced the Code for Unplanned Encounters at Sea (CUES) with the People’s Liberation Army-Navy Jiangkai II frigate Hengshui (FFG 572) Feb. 23 enhancing the professional ma...
 
 

AEGIS tracks, simulates engagement of three short-range ballistic missiles

The Missile Defense Agency and sailors aboard the guided-missile destroyers USS Carney (DDG 64), USS Gonzalez (DDG 66), and USS Barry (DDG 52) successfully completed a flight test involving the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense weapon system. At approximately 2:30 a.m., EST, Feb. 26, three short-range ballistic missile targets were launched near simultaneously from NASA’s Wallops...
 

 

DOD seeks novel ideas to shape its technological future

The Defense Department is seeking novel ideas to shape its future, and officials are looking to industry, small business, academia, start-ups, the public – anyone, really – to boost its ability to prevail against adversaries whose access to technology grows daily. The program, called the Long-Range Research and Development Plan, or LRRDP, began with an...
 
 

Air Force places 18 A-10 aircraft into ‘Backup Status’

The Air Force, with congressional authorization, will convert 18 primary combat-coded A-10 Thunderbolt II aircraft from active units and place them into Backup-Aircraft Inventory status with the possibility to convert another 18 at a later date in fiscal year 2015. The secretary of Defense has authorized the Air Force to place up to a total...
 
 

AFRL shape-changing materials make form a function

Air Force Research Laboratory research is shaping the future of aerospace. Through research into soft materials called liquid crystal elastomers, AFRL scientists have developed a method to locally program the mechanical response in polymer sheets without the use of actuators and traditional mechanical parts. This research (sponsored by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research)...
 




0 Comments


Be the first to comment!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>