Defense

September 30, 2013

Soldier input aids Army researchers

Tags:
Jake Dorsey
JB Lewis-McChord, Wash.

army-researchers3
When Army researchers needed feedback on a new combat vehicle, they went to the real experts – the users.

They visited experienced brigades – including 3rd Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division, a Stryker brigade combat team at Joint Base Lewis-McChord – to get the opinions of Soldiers whose lives could depend on the new vehicles and equipment.

“We’re engineers,” said Dawn Woods, human factors engineer with the Army’s Natick Soldier Research, Development & Engineering Center. “We do the best we can, but we’re not Soldiers. The purpose here is to bring Soldiers in and say, ‘What do you think of this? Are we going in the right direction?’ None of those ‘design (it), throw it over the fence and hope they can use it’ things.”

It’s the basis of the Occupant Centric Platform program, a joint project between the Army’s Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center; Tank Automotive RD&E Center, the Army Research Laboratory and engineering firm Pratt & Miller.
army-researchers1
Woods emphasized the program isn’t developing a direct replacement for the storied Stryker series, or the Bradley Fighting Vehicle. Instead, she and her team of contractors and government employees are working on developing technologies to be incorporated into future combat vehicles.

Those technologies, simulated inside a demo unit at a 3rd Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division, motor pool, include things large and small: from the size of future transports to their hatch sizes and shapes; from 360-degree view systems to enhanced seat belts.

Cpl. Kyle Lynch was one of the Soldiers who got to experience the demo unit, a metal chamber on stilts with the new technologies inside.

“It’s nice to be able to have input … to give feedback on what we think is good,” said Lynch, a Soldier with 1st Battalion, 23rd Infantry Regiment.

The Squad Automatic Weapon, known as a SAW, gunner last deployed to Afghanistan, and said he had no problems with Strykers, but storage always was a challenge. The vehicles commonly had to carry food, water and ammunition on the outside of the vehicle. It was difficult to fit two fully equipped fire teams inside a Stryker.
army-researchers2
Lynch said he liked the demo’s increased internal storage and the redesigned seating. He also appreciated the larger hatch designs.

So did Spec. Kyle Moschner, also with the 3rd Briage, 2nd Infantry Division. Another SAW gunner, he has experience with mine-resistant, ambush-protected vehicles, known as MRAPS, MRAP-All Terrain Vehicles and Stryker vehicles from Afghanistan.

“You’re cramped in any other vehicle I’ve been in so far,” he said, then glanced at the demo unit. “That was very spacious.”

Woods said the platform design accommodates 11 soldiers – two fire teams of four, a squad leader, a vehicle commander and a driver. Everyone who sat in the demo wore full kit and carried a weapon.

Researchers took detailed measurements of each Soldier, with kit and without, to see how their measurements compared to the rest of the Army’s population. The goal, Woods said, is to comfortably fit the maximum number of soldiers.

Fit mattered most during the redesigned hatch demonstrations.

Researchers constructed a series of painted plywood boxes, one bigger than the rest and with a large hole in its top. A slot above the hole allowed plywood boards with hatch shapes cut into them to be slipped above the big hole.

Soldiers then scrambled into the box from an open side, with full gear and weapons, and tried to exit out the “hatch.” The redesigned hatches, in the shapes of a near square and a circle, were wide enough that soldiers tumbled from them with relative ease and speed.

The smallest was the command hatch for a Bradley.

“Everybody was able to get out when we ran the drill,” Woods said, “but it took a while.”

Moschner said he ran the drill about 20 times, fast-paced for time. He weighs 205 pounds unburdened, and estimated he was close to 290 pounds with gear, body armor, weapon and ammunition.

“Being able to move in and out of a vehicle a lot easier, not having to trip up on people … being able to see outside without ever having to step foot outside will be a big advantage,” he said.

The contoured, cushioned seats and added internal space drew the gratitude of Sgt. Richard Kvinge of 1st Battalion, 37th Field Artillery Regiment.

“It’s like a vacation in there,” said the tanker formerly assigned to the 1st Armored Division.

The seat belts got attention, too. TARDEC Senior Mechanical Engineer Katrina Harris showed how new “ready reach restraints” were designed with the Soldier in mind. The first part of the over-the-shoulder belt is stiff, sticking out like a long tab that a Soldier can reach even when fully equipped.

Cargo retention systems are being examined too, thanks to Soldier input, Harris said. If a vehicle is hit by an explosive device, seemingly secure cargo can transform into multiple projectiles, flying around inside a vehicle and threatening the lives of Soldiers.

A lot more testing lies ahead in a process already four years old. Pratt & Miller will analyze detailed surveys with Soldiers’ likes and dislikes about the demo, which moves on to more bases and eventual testing for its resistance to explosions.

Lynch is glad they’re taking the feedback seriously.

“I’m just hoping it’ll shape the next generation of those vehicles,” he said, glancing at the rows of Strykers across the motor pool.




All of this week's top headlines to your email every Friday.


 
 

 

Headlines November 26, 2014

News: When Hagel leaves, new SecDef faces big questions about the military’s futureĀ - President Obama’s new pick to run the Pentagon will face a dizzying set of challenges affecting the Defense Department’s mission, budget and culture. Who will be the next Secretary of Defense?- Following the Nov. 24 surprise announcement from the White House, the...
 
 

News Briefs November 26, 2014

Navy to decommission two more ships in Puget Sound The Navy recently decommissioned the guided missile frigate USS Ingraham at Everett, Wash. It will be towed to Bremerton and scrapped. The Daily Herald reports the Navy also plans to decommission another ship at the Everett homeport and also one stationed in Bremerton. Naval Station Everett...
 
 

NASA airborne campaigns tackle climate questions from Africa to Arctic

NASA photograph The DC-8 airborne laboratory is one of several NASA aircraft that will fly in support of five new investigations into how different aspects of the interconnected Earth system influence climate change. NASA photograph The DC-8 airborne laboratory is one of several NASA aircraft that will fly in support of five new investigations into...
 

 
Air Force photograph by Rick Goodfriend

16T Pitch Boom reactivated to support wind tunnel tests

Air Force photograph by Rick Goodfriend The Pitch Boom at the AEDC 16-foot transonic wind tunnel (16T) was recently reactivated. This model support system is used in conjunction with a roll mechanism to provide a combined pitch...
 
 

Northrop Grumman supports U.S. Air Force Minuteman missile test launch

Northrop Grumman recently supported the successful flight testing of the U.S. Air Force’s Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile weapon system. The operational flight test was conducted as part of the Air Force Global Strike Command’s Force Development Evaluation Program. This program demonstrates and supports assessment of the accuracy, availability and reliability of the...
 
 
army-detector

Scientists turn handheld JCAD into a dual-use chemical, explosives detector

Scientists at the U.S. Army Edgewood Chemical Biological Center at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md., proved it is possible to teach an old dog new tricks by adding the ability to detect explosive materials to the Joint Chemical Age...
 




0 Comments


Be the first to comment!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>